Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Black Hawk Down



In 1993, The United States sent the Rangers and Delta Force into Somalia to capture the warlord Mohammed Farah Aidid for seizing food and aid shipments that were meant for the civilians. What was supposed to be an hour-long operation was turned upside down when two Black Hawk attack choppers were shot down over Mogadishu. The choppers were piloted by CWO Cliff Wolcott and CWO Michael Durant. Wolcott was killed on impact and Durant was captured by enemy forces. What was supposed to be a simple raid turned into a fight for survival against an entire city aimed at killing every single American soldier that set foot in the Bakara Market. The whole operation was led by Major General William Garrison, who wound up accepting full responsibility for the outcome of the raid. Black Hawk Down was based on the book written by Mark Bowden which chronicled the raid. Directed by legendary director Ridley Scott, Black Hawk Down was released to theaters in 2001 and was nominated for several Academy Awards, and won two of them: One for best editing and one for Best Sound.

Black Hawk Down opens as Delta Operators pounce on a particular target associated with Mohammed Farah Aidid, Osman Atto(George Harris), who ends up being interrogated by General Garrison(Sam Shepard). Turns out, a group of Aidid's lieutenants are holding a meeting somewhere in the city, and by capturing them, the US forces will be closer to capturing the warlord. The ground forces, commanded by LT. Colonel Daniel McKnight(Tom Sizemore)are to secure the surrounding area while Delta Force, headed by Lt Colonel Garry Harrell(Zelijko Ivanek) are to infiltrate the building and capture the enemy soldiers. As the teams are about to leave, armed Somalis shoot down the Black Hawk piloted by CWO Wolcott(Jeremy Piven). McKnight tells his second-in-command, Captain Steele(Jason Isaacs)to find and secure the crash site. Steele takes a small group of Rangers, which include SSGT. Matt Eversman(Josh Hartnett), Specialist John Grimes(Ewan McGregor), Specialist Lance Twombly(Tom Hardy), and SPC Shawn Nelson(Ewen Bremner). Eversman's group ends up getting split up from the convoy and Captain Steele, but manage to locate the crashed chopper. Shortly afterwards, a second chopper is shot down. This one piloted by CW3 Michael Durant(Ron Eldard). In a race against time to secure both crash sites, the US forces fight for their lives in one of the most intense close combat situation in US History since the Vietnam War.

Black Hawk Down boasts one of the largest ensemble casts of any war movie I've ever seen. Jason Isaacs, Ewan McGregor, Josh Hartnett, William Fichtner, Eric Bana, Jeremy Piven, Tom Sizemore, and Sam Shepard to start with. This movie also showcased some of the up-and-comers like Orlando Bloom and Tom Hardy. The acting caliber is top-notch. While a couple of the characters are fictional, most of the actors play the soldiers that were actually in Somalia at the time. Also, Black Hawk Down, being based on true events, is very gritty and realistic in terms of combat and how soldiers behave during intense situations. The film was supervised by Michael Durant, who was captured by Somali forces and held for 11 days, before being released. As a result, there's an air of authenticity to the film, which makes it more intense. The combat scenes in Black Hawk Down are extremely intense and at times extremely bloody. But, like Saving Private Ryan, the purpose of having such violent scenes is to show the audience that war is very ugly and brutal, and there are casualties on all sides.

Black Hawk Down had a limited release in December of 2001, and eventually had its wide release on January 18, 2002. For the most part, the film was well-received, except by the folks in Somalia, who claim that there's serious elements of racism in the film. I personally didn't see it. The film is very well-paced and doesn't feel like it drags. Some critics claim that there isn't much in the way of characterization, and to a certain extent, they are correct. But I don't think that's a weakness of the film. I think because the whole getting-to-know-the-soldiers routine while probably would've been interesting, I think it would have slowed the film down. This being a Jerry Bruckheimer production, there is a certain style to the film which makes it chaotic. Ridley Scott's direction helps keep the film contained and focused. The score, produced by Hans Zimmer, helps provide the emotion, by not being bombastic like you hear in so many action films, but it's subdued and Zimmer collaborated with several other people, which gives the soundtrack a unique and varied flavor.

There's a recurring theme in most modern war movies after Saving Private Ryan. The theme is that the soldiers that fight in a war are not just following orders, but look out for each other as well. As one of the characters in Black Hawk Down states, "Most people won't understand, that it's about the guy next to you." That theme helps make for a more emotionally compelling experience.

For as long as mankind has been on earth, we've been fighting and killing each other for one reason or another, be it for oil, land or what have you. Wars have consequences, on a personal and economic level. Some reasons don't make sense. As for why we were in Somalia, the official word is that the civil war in Somalia had caused the deaths of more than 300,000 civilians. We went in to remove one of the warlords responsible, and wound up in one of the most intense firefights in US history. 19 American soldiers lost their lives, and the Somalis suffered approximately over 1,000. Two Delta Force snipers, SFC Randy Shughart and MSG Gary Gordon were inserted near the second crash site, and were killed defending it. Because of their bravery, they were posthumously awarded the Medal Of Honor, the highest level of commendation that anyone can receive. Two weeks after Durant was released, President Clinton ordered The Rangers and Delta Force out of Somalia. In 1996, Mohammed Farah Aidid was killed. General Garrison retired the following day. I honestly don't think I can stress just how important it is to recognize the soldiers that have given their lives in combat so that others can live. US soldiers across the world put their lives on the line everyday, and I think it's a great disservice to ignore them. We may not always agree as to why our soldiers are there, but they should be supported regardless.

Overall, Black Hawk Down is an intense war movie and anyone remotely interested in the genre should check it out. While it's not a perfect film, I think it's effective and very compelling. I give it a 9/10.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Enter The Dragon


In 1966, a television series premiered starring Van Williams. It featured a protagonist wearing a green suit and mask and fought crime while having a day job as a newspaper publisher. However, it was the Green Hornet's sidekick, Kato that garnered the most attention. Kato was played by the up-and-coming martial arts superstar Bruce Lee. Bruce Lee took the world by storm with his martial arts displays in The Green Hornet. So much so, that he was offered to star in his own films. Between 1967 and 1973, Lee had starred in several films, which included The Big Boss, Fist of Fury, Way of the Dragon and Enter The Dragon. During that time, Bruce Lee had also developed his own unique style of martial arts, Jeet Kune Do(Way of the Intercepting Fist), which incorporated not only Wing Chun kung-fu, but other styles of martial arts. Enter The Dragon was Bruce Lee's final completed film before his untimely death in 1973.

Enter the Dragon opens on a small martial arts demonstration at a Shaolin temple in Hong Kong, between two fighters, Lee(Bruce Lee) and an unknown fighter(Sammo Hung). He is then informed by an Interpol agent, Braithwaite(Geoffrey Weeks) that an upcoming martial arts tournament is hosted by a renegade Shaolin monk, Han(Shih Kien). Braithwaite suspects Han of human trafficking and drug smuggling, and uses the tournament to further his schemes. Joining Lee is gambler Roper(John Saxon) and street-wise Williams(Jim Kelly).

Enter The Dragon opened to critical acclaim world-wide. With a stellar cast that includes not only John Saxon and Jim Kelly, it also featured several up-and-coming Asian martial arts stars including Bolo Yeung, Sammo Hung and Jackie Chan(in a brief cameo appearance). Han's henchman, O'Hara is played by Karate expert Robert Wall, who also appeared in Way of the Dragon alongside kickboxing champion Chuck Norris. With a good story, great acting, memorable characters and stellar fight choreography by Bruce Lee, Enter The Dragon is widely considered the greatest martial arts film ever, and withstands the test of time. Unfortunately, Bruce Lee didn't survive to see the film's success. As a result of an allergic reaction to pain medication, Bruce Lee passed away at the age of 32 in Hong Kong in 1973.

Bruce Lee is considered by many to be the one person who introduced Kung-Fu to the west and made martial arts as popular as it is today. Every martial arts movie that has been made so far has been influenced in some fashion by Bruce Lee. His enthusiasm for martial arts has inspired many people for over 30 years, and because of him, Jeet Kune Do became more popular, and stars like Chuck Norris, Jackie Chan, and Sammo Hung became huge international stars as a result. Bruce Lee had two children, Shannon and Brandon Lee, who also followed in their father's footsteps. Sadly, Brandon was killed in 1993 in a freak accident while filming the gothic action film, The Crow. Shannon Lee left acting and became the CEO of Bruce Lee Enterprises and oversees the licensing of her father's name and likeness. Bruce Lee's legacy has and still is being felt all across the world today. As a martial arts actor, Bruce Lee had no equal, he was charismatic and funny. Enter The Dragon stands the test of time as one of the greatest movies ever made and the best Kung-Fu movie ever made. If there is any downside to Enter The Dragon, is that it was Lee's last completed film. Other than that, this movie is beyond reproach. There have been similar movies made after Enter The Dragon, but no-one in their right mind has attempted to re-make or re-imagine it. It is untouchable.

It should be noted that there have been movies made of Bruce Lee, the most popular of which is Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story, which starred Jason Scott Lee as Bruce. But, while spectacular at times, failed to really explain Bruce Lee's life story. Enter The Dragon is the quintessential Bruce Lee film, but I would also recommend some of his earlier works, like Way of the Dragon, The Big Boss and The Chinese Connection. There are no words adequate enough to explain the influence Bruce Lee had on almost everything. Philosophy, martial arts, film, Bruce Lee has been a part of it all and none of it has been the same since, and no-one has come close to duplicating what Bruce Lee had accomplished in his short time on Earth. Enter The Dragon gets no rating, because it doesn't need one. It is without a doubt my personal favorite martial arts movie and it never gets old. It's one I would recommend without hesitation to anyone remotely interested in kung-fu movies.

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Mimic 3: Sentinel

Direct-to-video sequels. Good gravy. I personally have no issues with films that end up skipping a theatrical release and go straight to video. Some of the best movies end up taking that route. But usually the reason for them not getting a theatrical release is because the movie was made on a very small budget and the studio doesn't feel that it doesn't deserve a theatrical release, and in most cases it's true. Worse still, are direct-to-video sequels to a film that DID get a theatrical release, limited or otherwise. Starship Troopers got two DTV(direct-to-video) sequels, and not one of them were good. Feast got two sequels and only the third movie was half-decent. The Crow had ONE sequel go to theaters, the other two? DTV. Hellraiser? 3 theatricals and 5 DTV. Some of these sequels were given to films that you would think didn't need one. The original film ended in a way that was satisfying and concluded the story. Apparently, some of the studio heads didn't think so. Guillermo Del Toro's Mimic was released in 1997 to mixed reviews and wasn't what Del Toro wanted to release due to studio interference. But a lot of people seemed to have liked it enough, but it just vanished off the radar. In 2001, Mimic 2 was quietly released to home video. There's a reason for that, I think. It was a terrible film. I didn't review it, because I fast forwarded through most of it, it was so boring. The visual effects were okay, but the concept and execution? Horrendous. 2003 saw the release of the final Mimic film, Mimic 3: Sentinel, also DTV, but it actually ended up being a much better film than Mimic 2.

Mimic 3 opens as an apparent Peeping Tom, Marvin(Karl Geary) is taking pictures of random people in an apartment complex across the street. That is until he notices something bizarre on the street below, after witnessing a child going into an alley and disappears. Marvin is a survivor of the strickler's disease that ravaged New York in 1997. Unfortunately, Marvin is stuck in his room because of the disease. He's also on Oxygen. The only contact with the outside world is his sister, Rosy(Alexis Dziena) and his mother, Simone(Amanda Plummer). After noticing another apparent murder, Marvin notices a strange garbageman(Lance Henriksen) in the area who may or may not know something about what's going on. As the body count begins to rise, Marvin realizes that the Judas Breed from 1997 has survived and is killing people.

One of the things that this installment has going for it, is it's Rear Window vibe, where you have a single person that's watching everything going on from his home. There's a bit of helplessness going as Marvin is a physically fragile person and is unable to actually do much aside from telling people what's going on. Most people, including the police don't believe him. Taking a cue from the original Mimic, Sentinel, while bloody isn't overly gory. There's a good deal of restraint. The creatures themselves aren't too bad, outside of some poor CG(due to budget limitations no doubt), when the creatures are in their full glory. Close up shots involve a guy in a suit who happens to be the film's visual effects person(Gary J. Tunnicliffe). While the film is confined to basically just a few rooms, the tension actually builds, especially when Lance Henriksen's character comes into the picture. We don't know much about his character, except that he helped work on the Judas Breed. Say what you will about some of the movies that Henriksen's been in, the man is a living legend, having appeared in some of the biggest films like Terminator, Aliens, and Near Dark, among others. He always manages to bring a legitimacy to the material that he's working with, even if the film is direct-to-video crap. Henriksen always manages to make it entertaining. Overall, Mimic 3 actually manages to be a fairly decent DTV effort. Is it a good movie? Not really, but I definitely appreciate the approach they took to it, and it manages to be kind of intense, despite being silly at time. Even Guillermo Del Toro himself kind of liked it, which really says something about the film. If you must have more Mimic, skip the dreadful second movie and go for this one instead. The film was directed by then-newcomer J.T Petty. He actually did a decent job here. Come for the bugs, stay for Lance Henriksen. Mimic 3 gets a solid 8/10.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

A Question of Desensitivity

As a film critic, sometimes I like to challenge myself by watching movies that most people would say, "Oh, hell no!" to. I suppose in a certain regard, I'm kind of throwing myself under the bus to endure the movies that most rational people wouldn't touch with a 50-foot pole. I tend to gravitate towards horror movies and some of the most shocking films that have been committed to film are horror movies. Granted people thought that Friday the 13 and Nightmare on Elm Street were shocking. But I'm talking about movies like Audition and A Serbian Film. These are some of the most depraved movies I've ever seen. After having seen A Serbian Film, nothing shocks me anymore. And on the other side of the coin, no other movie prior to A Serbian Film has shocked me. I guess that would say something about how desensitized I am to violence on film, that it takes that one movie to actually make me genuinely feel something. I don't regret seeing A Serbian Film, hell I own a copy of it on Blu-Ray. But I have a copy to remind that not all movies are rosy. Some will drag you through the dirt and the muck. I just recently viewed The Human Centipede II: Full Sequence. It was hyped up to be brutal and gross, and it certainly delivered. I won't review it here. I posted it on The Dead Centre, a small horror community that I'm a staff member of. I appreciate a good horror movie, but sometimes I end up getting more than I bargained for. Then again, I AM a fan of horror movies, and the fans of the genre are always looking for stuff that's going to push the envelope.

The genre isn't for everybody, and even those that claim to be hardcore fans, there are certain dark corners of the genre that they won't peek into. As a film critic, I feel it's my obligation to seek out the particular films that no-one has heard of, the controversial and the bizarre. I remain as objective as possible when I review movies, but A Serbian Film reminded me that it's not that easy to stay objective, because there are certain subjects that tend to get my blood boiling. But as reviewer, the trick is to not let emotion take control of the review, which I have seen happen before from other critics. Some critics have a blatant disregard for the horror genre, and to me that's dishonest. Horror is as legitimate a genre as comedy, even though it's geared towards a certain audience. I think if you're going to enjoy the genre, be careful, because there are films out there that will pummel you if you're not ready. If you're curious about the horror films that I've reviewed, I will point you to: www.thedeadcentre.com.

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Mimic

Guillermo Del Toro is an interesting director. Most of the movies he's directed are a combination of science fiction, fantasy and horror. The man who gave us Pan's Labyrinth, also gave us the Hellboy movies, Blade II, Cronos, and a rather underrated thriller called Mimic. I don't think a lot of people payed attention to Del Toro until Blade II was released. After that, he really started picking up steam. But one of his more unusual films, Mimic was released in 1997 to mixed reviews. Del Toro himself was unhappy with the version that was released to theaters. But that was because the studio execs kept changing things on him and rejecting his ideas, and eventually brought in 2nd unit directors to give the film more "scares" and more action. It certainly wasn't his intent. I'll get to that later.

The film opens in New York City as hundreds of kids are in the hospital due to a lethal disease called strickler's disease. The disease was carried by cockroaches in the sewers beneath the city. To combat this epidemic, Dr. Susan Tyler(Mira Sorvino) created a new breed of cockroach, dubbed the Judas Breed, and released it in the sewers. As a result the roaches carrying the disease were destroyed and the disease eradicated. Fast-forward 3 years, Susan is married to fellow scientist and CDC employee, Dr. Peter Mann(Jeremy Northam). During a routine investigation Dr. Mann and his assistant, Josh(Josh Brolin) discover a slavery ring underneath a local church, which is infested with cockroaches. Later, Susan gets a unique specimen from a couple of local kids. Turns out that the Judas Breed that she created has survived and evolved. Enough to the point where the bugs are mimicking us. In an effort to keep the bugs from spreading they enlist the help of a local cop, Leonard(Charles S. Dutton) to help them navigate the tunnels beneath the city.

The story is actually pretty decent for a bit of a monster movie. The creatures themselves are actually uniquely designed and really pose a threat. And with the exception of some shots, mostly practical. You don't actually get a good look until much later in the movie when the creatures attack some kids in the subway. Now, given that this is a creature feature, you should expect really creepy monsters, and I don't think there's anything creepier than a cockroach, except maybe spiders. The acting is actually very solid all around with Mira Sorvino playing the sexy, yet intelligent Susan Tyler. This is one of Josh Brolin's first real big roles and he's not only convincing but funny as well. Charles S. Dutton. What can I say about the man? He inhabits every role that he takes on. From his roles in Alien 3, Rudy and Mimic to movies like Legion, he elevates the film with a powerful and intimidating presence, which makes it sort of funny when you see him freaking out in Mimic. I don't think anyone else could have handled the character as well as he could.

Now, in a monster movie that's rated R, you would expect it to be pretty gory. While there are moments of SOME gore, you really don't see a lot of intestines being torn out or heads being ripped off, it's not that kind of movie. It gets pretty gross at times with slime and shit everywhere(literally).

Things got really hairy between the director and the execs during the production of the film, and the film that ended up in theaters wasn't what Guillermo Del Toro wanted. The execs wanted more cheap scares, while Del Toro opted for a more atmospheric film. So, the execs hired 2nd unit directors to edit and toss out some of the stuff that would've made a better movie with. This being released in the 90's, also meant that you weren't allowed to have kids killed on screen or animals for that matter. And while there is the argument that "less-is-more" is more artistic than the stuff that you actually see, in a monster movie, you need to see what these creatures are capable of. For the Blu-Ray release of Mimic, most of Del Toro's stuff that he shot that was discarded has been reintegrated into the film, which includes a sub-plot that involves a slavery ring, and more on Susan's attempts to get pregnant. One of the scenes that I had just mentioned where two kids were killed on screen, was also put back into the film. Most of the crap that was filmed by the second unit directors has been discarded in favor of a more atmospheric creature feature, and it actually works better this way. Granted the last act of the film borders on cliche, it's still a visceral and exciting ride. Granted, even with this new director's cut, the film isn't perfect. Certain characters are just bystanders and some of the CGI effects simply just don't stand up as well today. The practical effects still do, though. While Mimic certainly isn't Guillermo's best film, it's still a solid film with solid performances and an atmosphere that still sends chills down my spine. I just wish that Guillermo Del Toro was allowed to make the film that he really wanted to make. Overall, this new director's cut is several steps above and beyond the original release and I give it a solid 9/10.


As a side note, there were two direct-to-video video sequels that were made. On the commentary on the Blu-Ray, Del Toro mentions these films and says while the first sequel was absolute crap, he actually liked the third film. Having seen the second film, I agree with his assessment on that film. I have yet to see the third film however. I will post a review as soon as I do. The original film stands on it's own as a decent sci-fi thriller and deserves to be seen. Just make sure it's the director's cut.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Resident Evil

Movies based on video games. Paul W.S. Anderson. The general rule of thumb with movies based on video games is that they really suck, and vice versa. I think the reason that movies based on video games suck is that most of them stray too far from the source material and end up pissing off the fans of that particular game, because the film doesn't deliver what they want to see. On the other hand, gamers are a finicky bunch because even if the film delivered what they wanted to see, they always bitch about how it sucks and it shouldn't have been made. I will agree with that sentiment when Uwe Boll gets the job, he screws it all up. There are some movies that DO get it right, even if they aren't perfect. Paul W.S. Anderson directed his first video game movie, Mortal Kombat, which was actually pretty decent in terms of acting and on-screen mayhem. Anderson would go on to direct other films like Event Horizon, Resident Evil and Alien Vs Predator. Resident Evil is another game-based movie that gets it right....mostly.

The film opens as a woman, Alice(Milla Jovovich) wakes up in a mansion with no memory of who she is, where she is, or why she's there. Soon, the mansion is breached by a small special forces group headed by James Shade(Colin Salmon) and Rain Ocampo(Michelle Rodriguez). It seems that the mansion is a secret entrance to a highly classified underground facility called The Hive, which is run by the Umbrella Corporation. It also appears that said facility has suffered a major catastrophe when a lethal virus was unleashed, killing everyone inside and forcing the facility's artificial intelligence to seal it off from the outside world. Only thing is, the people that were killed inside the facility didn't stay dead.

Having actually played the Resident Evil games, the movie is actually quite faithful in terms of atmosphere, story and.....zombies. Resident Evil was originally going to be directed by the godfather of zombie movies, George Romero, but due to some disagreements, he opted not to do it. So, Paul W.S. Anderson stepped in. There is not a zombie movie out there today that hasn't been influenced by Romero's work in some fashion. Resident Evil doesn't just have the zombies, but zombie dogs. Yes, dogs. These suckers are creepy as hell. The licker, despite some bad CGI is a very interesting creature that evolves after it attacks someone. What also works is the cast. Leading the way is the very sexy Milla Jovovich who does a lot of her own stunts and action sequences in the film despite her being in a fairly revealing dress.....not that I mind of course. Michelle Rodriguez brings her usual tough-girl attitude to the screen, but it works fairly well here. She's a real spit-fire that doesn't hesitate to whoop some ass. The rest of cast does well despite being general fodder for zombies and a psychotic A.I.

The effects are mostly practical. The make-up effects and the zombies are done very well with the exception of some bad CGI. The zombie dogs are done very well. Despite the good practical effects, the CGI is pretty bad, especially when you first see the zombie that's missing half of his face. That was pretty horrendous. The licker creature is straight up CGI, despite some close-up shots that are clearly a puppet. While the design of the creature is brilliant, the CGI execution is less than spectacular. One good thing is that the film's R-rating allows for some fairly gruesome effects shots and for the most part do the job well. Had the film been PG-13....well, it's not, thankfully. The music has a very hard edge to it, as it was composed by Marco Beltrami AND Marilyn Manson, and it's appropriate for this type of film.

Resident Evil was fairly successful as there are three sequels available on home video: Apocalypse, Extinction and Afterlife. Another sequel is on the way, entitled Retribution. There's also another Resident Evil game coming soon, but I haven't been a fan of the series since Resident Evil 3. So...despite so many movies based on video games going wrong, Resident Evil at least takes its source material seriously and Paul W.S. Anderson expertly crafts a fairly decent horror/action film. The bad CGI takes a toll however. Overall, it's still a very solid effort. 8.5/10 is what this one gets.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Rage

A few weeks ago, I was offered an opportunity to screen and review an independent movie. I jumped at the chance, because this is the first time I've had an opportunity like this. I received a screener copy of an independent thriller called Rage, and I want to thank those who gave me the chance to review this film, which to my knowledge hasn't been distributed to the public yet. I love a good cat-and-mouse thriller, and there have been quite a few. Some are more well-known than others. Then again, you could call your typical slasher movie cat-and-mouse, because that seems to be the general theme. Rage is not a slasher, however. It's a different kind of movie.

The film opens in a suburb of Portland, Oregon. A struggling novelist, Dennis Twist(Rick Crawford) is going to town to pick up something for his wife, Crystal(Audrey Walker). On his way, he stops to break off an affair he had been having with a local shop owner, Dana(Anna Lodej). In a parking lot he ends up running into a mysterious biker(Christopher R. Witherspoon) for some strange reason. At first, Dennis thinks nothing of it. But later, he notices that this biker has a particular interest in him and starts following him around the city. Things take a more sinister turn after he has lunch with his therapist.

Okay, so the story isn't particularly original, as it's been done before. What makes it interesting is the biker. There's something to be said about a villain of which you know nothing about. You don't know his name, what he sounds or looks like, or why he's tailing a particular person. It makes for a more unusual chase. The biker is played by the film's director Christopher Witherspoon and he's pretty intimidating. Especially with that little knife that he's always carrying around. The acting is solid across the board. Rick Crawford plays a struggling novelist who knows he's done a bad thing and cheated on his wife, and he wants to set things right. Audrey Walker plays the unknowing wife, who ends up being a victim of not only the biker, but of her husband's infidelity. I found that angle to be pretty interesting and certainly seems to play a role in the events in the final part of the film. I say "seems" because, not everything is what it appears to be. And that is also what makes this film pretty good. The film also seems to have a strange sense of humor throughout the whole thing. For example, there's a scene in which Rick's character thinks he sees the biker and scratches his bike. Only it turns out to be someone else.

The film does take a vicious turn in the final act and it's unsettling. While most of the violence IS off-screen, the stuff that IS shown is fairly brutal, especially when Audrey's character is involved. Now, it's time for the bad stuff. Early on, there's some ominous music playing even when Rick's character is just driving along. Why? I think all that does is just tell the audience that something bad could happen. For a film like Rage, I think the music could have been dialed back a bit. Also, the narration during some of the scenes when Dennis is thinking is unnecessary. I think the audience is smart enough to know what the character is thinking without him having to narrate the guy's thought process. Those are my two biggest gripes.

On the whole, for a film that was made for a mere $100,000(according to IMDB), this is actually a really rock-solid thriller. Sure it's not perfect, but that's due to the limitations of the budget. I really hope that more people get to see this film, because it shows that you can make a good movie for a shoe-string budget, and that's what Chris Witherspoon did. Not only did Chris play an interestingly twisted character, he crafted an edge-of-your-seat thriller that is well-paced and well-acted. I think that Rage could make a splash in the independent movie genre, if it finds a distributor that's willing to screen the film for more people. I think they could be surprised at how good this one is. This one gets a solid 9/10. I enjoyed it a lot.